Andrea's framing, verbatim: "the yield is not easy to come by, it is usually created." This file is the per-asset-class reference for HOW — the real levers a buyer/owner can pull to raise a property's income, each with the rule that bounds it, the sizing/economics that make it work, and the fleet tool that already computes part of it. For Andrea's own learning first, and as source material for a Format 4 "How to create the yield here" slide, a commercial_market_pack.py value-add section, and Agent 03's lead-magnet template — not yet wired into any of those (see § "Not yet built" at the end).
Figures last verified 29 Aug 2026.
| Play | Rule | Numbers | Question |
|---|---|---|---|
| Half-shop / sub-let a portion | Landlord-consent informal sub-letting is the fast route; a FORMAL split into two saleable strata lots needs URA plan lodgment + BCA share-value re-allocation (application fee S$1,500 per application) + MCST involvement. | Smaller subdivided units fetch a HIGHER psf on sale, but only the visible/entrance-near ones let easily — buildings with heavy subdivision get "unfriendly layouts" from the exercise (industry commentary, citicommercial.com.sg). | Is this unit's frontage/entrance position strong enough that a smaller half survives, or does subdividing just create a second unit nobody wants? |
| Fit-out for the highest-psf trade this catchment supports | URA use-check FIRST (01-ListingAgent/tools/use_check.py) — never fit out ahead of a confirmed use. F&B infrastructure (gas, exhaust, grease trap) is the single highest-value fit-out on record in the fleet's own data (The Midtown). | — | What trade is this catchment's age/income profile (catchment_profile.py) actually short of? |
| Change of use to the trade the catchment lacks | URA Change-of-Use application — "assessable," never guaranteed. | trade_prospects.py gives real operator contacts once a trade is picked. | Does the mall-gravity position (catchment_profile.mall_gravity) support a destination trade, or only a convenience one? |
| Lease structuring | Shorter tenor + rent step-ups suits a seller optimising for a fresh income story; a longer tenor suits a buyer optimising for financing terms. | — | Is this listing priced for the tenant's flexibility or the landlord's certainty — and which does THIS buyer need? |
| CSFS bonus-GFA space (community/sports use) | Community/Sports Facilities Scheme (URA/PB/2026/10-DCG, effective 21 Aug 2026 – 21 Aug 2029, superseding URA/PB/2020/01-DCG): a mall/commercial development can carry bonus GFA — cap 10% of Master Plan GFA or 2,000 sqm, whichever lower — for space endorsed to a community/sports operator on a strata title or 10-year-minimum lease. As of this circular, URA no longer endorses a NEW childcare centre into CSFS space; an existing CSFS-endorsed centre continues if compliant, but expansion isn't supported. Eldercare, disability services, family services, community libraries, community clubs and (newly formalised) arts uses remain live categories. | Bonus space is capped at whichever is LOWER of the two figures — a small site's cap is the 2,000 sqm ceiling, not the 10% figure. | Is this unit's floor CSFS bonus-GFA at all — and if so, is a NEW childcare fit-out actually off the table here, or is another community/sports use the better angle? |
| Play | Rule | Numbers | Question |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rent out the living quarters separately | HDB approval via GoBusiness required; S$109 (incl. GST) admin fee per application; minimum 6-month tenancy per (sub)tenant — no short-term letting; occupancy cap 6 (3-room+ living quarters) / 4 (1-2 room). (hdb.gov.sg, "Renting Out Living Quarters") | — | Is the living quarters currently vacant, owner-occupied, or already producing a second income stream? |
| Sub-let up to 50% of the trading area | HDB commercial-tenant rule: a tenant of HDB commercial premises may sub-let up to 50% of the trading area (or the living quarters, for residential use) — the formal "half shop." | — | What second trade would complement, not compete with, the existing tenant? |
| Change of trade | HDB approval required; the incoming trade's licence class matters (a Cat-1 F&B licence transfers differently from a fresh application — see the 18 Upper Boon Keng case, 01-ListingAgent campaign history). | — | Does the licence transfer with the trade, or does the buyer start a fresh application clock? |
| The coffeeshop operator → stallholder model | Operator leases the WHOLE premises from HDB/owner, sub-lets individual stalls — the purest "yield is created, not found" case: the operator's margin comes from the spread between the master rent and the sum of stall rents. | Real 2025-26 figures (news-sourced, cite the outlet): a Toa Payoh coffeeshop changed hands at ~S$24,000/month master rent, with stall rents cut ~40% and refilled with the operator's own brands (community read this partly as a paid promotional piece — flag the source). Stall rents run S$6,000-S$12,000+/month in new estates (Home & Decor; community-cited range S$3k-S$12k depending on stall type and estate age). Coffeeshop ASSET sale prices run S$20-40M. Rule of thumb cited by industry sources: a 30-year-lease coffeeshop needs roughly 8-9% gross yield to be considered "healthy," against a general market average nearer 4%. | Who is actually capturing the spread here — the operator, or is there room for the buyer to run it directly? |
| Play | Rule | Numbers | Question |
|---|---|---|---|
| Right-size the floor plate for the format | No regulatory cap — pure space economics (INDICATIVE, industry benchmarks, not an official rule). | Open-plan hot-desking: 50-80 sqft/desk. Mixed desks + meeting rooms: 100-120 sqft/person. A ~3,000 sqft floor with ~100 desks is the commonly cited reference point for a standalone Singapore operator. Break-even occupancy: 65-85%. Median closed-office desk price (2026): ~S$722/month (half the market prices below this). Rent typically 30-40% of revenue; margin (EBITDA) 10-20% once mature, usually 12-16 months after opening. | Does this unit's own sqft clear the ~3,000 sqft / 100-desk reference point, or is it better suited to a single serviced-office tenant instead of an operator? |
| Sub-let partitioned suites within the strata lot | No separate strata title needed if partitions are non-structural — check the lease/MCST by-laws for sub-letting consent. | — | Does the lease already permit sub-letting, or does this need landlord consent first? |
| Amalgamate adjoining units for a contiguous floor plate | Subject to both units' strata titles and, for JTC/URA industrial-flavoured stock, the same-owner rule; MCST/BCA approval needed post-purchase. Worked fleet example: BizTech Centre's four adjoining Level 5 units combine to ~4,188 sqft. | — | Is the adjoining unit under the same seller, and has adjacency actually been confirmed on the strata plan (not just presumed from sequential numbering)? |
| CBD Incentive Scheme 2.0 — redevelop an ageing office into mixed-use | Converts an older, predominantly-office building into residential/hotel/mixed-use. Eligibility: ≥20 years old from last TOP, predominantly office use, in Anson/Cecil Street (≥1,000–2,000 sqm depending on frontage) or Robinson Road/Shenton Way/Tanjong Pagar. Live 7 Feb 2025 – 6 Feb 2030 (Outline Applications only). No strata subdivision of the resulting commercial component (except to delineate different commercial uses). | Allowable intensification up to 25–30% above the higher of Master Plan 2019 GPR or approved GPR, depending on the use-mix chosen (residential-with-commercial highest at 30% in Anson/Cecil St). Requires Green Mark Platinum Super Low Energy + Maintainability/Whole Life Carbon badges, plus an ITM implementation plan + security deposit to BCA. | Is this building ≥20 years from TOP and inside one of the three named precincts — and does the seller's price already assume this upside, or is it still unpriced? |
| Strategic Development Incentive (SDI) 2.0 — amalgamated redevelopment in a strategic area | For Orchard Road/CBD/Marina Centre and other strategic areas; normally needs ≥2 adjacent sites for a "transformational impact" (single-site exemptions considered case-by-case — e.g. plugging a pedestrian-network gap or opening a waterfront view corridor). Building must be ≥20 years old, predominantly commercial/mixed-use (not predominantly residential). Live 7 Feb 2025 – 6 Feb 2030. | Deviations available on GPR/GFA, land use mix, and building height — evaluated case-by-case, no fixed percentage cap published. Same enhanced Green Mark/ITM conditions as CBD Incentive 2.0. | Does this site have a plausible amalgamation partner next door, and is the seller (or a co-owner) actually willing to coordinate a joint application? |
| DCS/CCS bonus Utility GFA — free up floor area by joining a district cooling network | A building that decommissions its own in-building chiller plant (IBCP) to join a District Cooling System / Centralised Cooling System gets that space back as usable floor area (if the old IBCP space was GFA-exempt, bonus GFA equal to its footprint is granted over and above the Master Plan GFA instead). Only applies once an operational DCS/CCS network exists in the area and the building doesn't already have a mandatory-DCS condition from its GLS tender. | Bonus/freed GFA may attract Land Betterment Charge depending on the proposed use of the reclaimed space. Receiving buildings generally need to be ≥10 years old from TOP unless there was no DCS/CCS network operating when the building was first approved. | Is there an operational DCS/CCS network already serving this precinct, and how old is the building's own chiller plant relative to a 10-year replacement cycle? |
| BE Transformation GFA — bonus floor area for a high-ITM-outcome redevelopment | Up to 3% bonus GFA (private sites ≥5,000 sqm GFA; smaller sites case-by-case) for hitting Construction ITM digitisation/productivity/sustainability outcomes on a new-erection or major addition-and-alteration proposal. Expires 23 Nov 2026 for new private-site applications — a real, dated deadline, not a forecast. GLS sites launched before 31 Mar 2022 get up to 2% instead. | Cumulative bonus GFA across all schemes stays capped at 10% above Master Plan GPR; none of it carries forward as future development potential on a later redevelopment. | Is a redevelopment proposal for this site realistically submittable before 23 Nov 2026 — and if not, does the seller's asking price already discount that this specific upside is closing? |
| Play | Rule | Numbers | Question |
|---|---|---|---|
| Add a mezzanine | Mezzanines can cover up to roughly 50% of the floor plate and, in many cases, sit outside gross plot ratio — but ANY office-type use on the mezzanine counts toward the ancillary cap below. BCA structural approval required. | — | Is the mezzanine planned as storage (doesn't eat the ancillary cap) or as office space (does)? |
| Fit out the ancillary office to the ceiling | The 60:40 rule: at least 60% of GFA must stay core industrial use; up to 40% may be ancillary office/admin space — office-grade fit-out and rent on that 40%. | — | How much of the current floor area is already ancillary vs core — is there headroom left under the 40% cap? |
| Change of use to canteen / childcare / showroom | JTC/URA Change-of-Use — assessable, never guaranteed; worked fleet example Paya Lebar 178 (URA lists childcare, an industrial canteen and general industrial as assessable at that address). | — | Is the surrounding worker/resident catchment (catchment_profile.py) actually large enough to support the alternative use? |
| Multi-tenant subdivision of a whole floor | Same 60:40 rule applies per subdivided unit, not just the whole floor — subdividing without re-checking the ratio per new unit is a common compliance miss. | — | Has each subdivided unit's own use-mix been re-checked against the 60:40 rule, or only the floor as a whole? |
| Play | Rule | Numbers | Question |
|---|---|---|---|
| Room-by-room letting | Occupancy cap: up to 8 unrelated persons in private homes ≥90 sqm and 4-room+ HDB flats — extended to 31 Dec 2028, then reverts to 6 (private) — HDB's own 4-room+ cap also drops to 6 for tenancies extending past that date. URA registration required for private (min 3-month lease, no owner-stay requirement); HDB approval for HDB flats. | Rooms cited at S$800-1,200/month (Tampines-area example) vs a stable but lower whole-unit rent. | Does the room-letting premium survive after turnover and extra management time are priced in, or does it just look better on the headline number? |
| Furnish + fit for the tenant this catchment actually has | No regulatory rule — a demand-matching play. | Use catchment_profile.py's age/household mix (expat/PR family density vs single-professional density) to decide furnished-family vs furnished-single. | — |
| Corporate / diplomatic-clause tenancies | Standard lease-clause negotiation, not a regulatory play. | — | Does the unit's profile (size, location, building class) actually fit a corporate-tenant brief, or is this aspirational? |
| Play | Rule | Numbers | Question |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subdivide the plot | URA Development Control Handbook plot-size/width rules (screened by 10-PropertyCompsAgent/subdivision_screen.py — Landed Housing Area zoning + cadastral lot geometry, always "indicative — subject to URA approval"). | — | Does this plot actually clear the minimum width/size rule, or does the screen say it's borderline? |
| Rebuild / A&A to maximum GFA | Governed by the same DC Handbook envelope; construction cost estimated via 10-PropertyCompsAgent/replacement_cost.py / tools/build_cost.py. | Construction rate bands (indicative, replacement_cost.py): conservation shophouse restoration ~S$400-1,000 psf; new-build landed ~S$300-550 psf; A&A/fit-out only ~S$150-350 psf. | Does the uplift from a rebuild clear its own construction cost within a holding period this buyer would actually accept? |
| Co-living conversion | Same 8-occupant cap (private homes ≥90 sqm) to 31 Dec 2028, then 6 — see § 5. | Community pushback on this exact play (r/SgHENRY, 29 Aug 2026): "ROE ~2%, might as well treasury" — a real objection to weigh, not dismiss (see buyer-objections.md). | Does the arithmetic still work once the 2028 cap reverts to 6, or does this play expire with the relaxation? |
| 3-generation configuration (extra bedroom, ground-floor suite for grandparents) | No regulatory play — a demand-matching one. | catchment_profile.py's hh_3gen_share gives the real 3-generation-household share for the planning area — worked fleet example: Simpang Bedok's seven-ensuite-bedroom layout markets directly at this. | Does the local 3-gen household share actually support this configuration, or is it a guess dressed as a feature? |
commercial_market_pack.py value-add section.plans/decision-criteria.md § 6/7 doctrine line (a commercial/industrial/ landed pack names at least one value-add lever, with its rule and its bound, or states in assumptions[] why none applies) — not yet added to that file; see intake.md for where it currently only touches catchment, not value-add.Re-verify HDB/URA/JTC/BCA rule pages before quoting a figure client-facing — this file is a reference captured 29 Aug 2026, not a live feed. Coffeeshop/ stall-rent figures are the most likely to move; re-check via EdgeProp/ Stacked Homes/TOC before citing a specific number in a pack.
Have a question about how this applies to your own numbers? Andrea reads every message herself.
WhatsApp AndreaGeneral information only, not financial or legal advice, and not a forecast — figures are past-tense, sourced, and dated as shown above. Verify me: search 9693 7787 on the CEA Public Register. If an advert for this property shows a different number, it is not me. Andrea Goh · PropNex Realty Pte Ltd (Licence No. L3008022J) · CEA R000289H · 9693 7787.